December 24, 2008
BUD
I was just getting ready to head to bed when I noticed that my Christmas cactus has a bloom!

Last year, my uncle was trimming one of the plants that's been in our family for generations. I took the trimmings home and put them in a pot. The cactus has grown a little since I got it, but it has never bloomed before.
A Christmas cactus getting its first bloom on Christmas. Now that just makes me smile.
Posted by: Sarah at
05:11 PM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 80 words, total size 1 kb.
1
That's wonderful! Merry Christmas, Sarah!
Posted by: Miss Ladybug at December 25, 2008 06:56 AM (zoxao)
2
That's so kewl! Merry Christmas :-)
Posted by: Barb at December 25, 2008 12:35 PM (p+dnl)
Posted by: tiffany jewelry at February 09, 2009 09:30 PM (zfzkt)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
MERRY CHRISTMAS, MATEY!
I found
the pirate ship online that I made at work:

It was actually not a terrible product. It was way too hard for "age 6 and up" like the box says, but it was made from better quality stuff than the other foam constructions I've done lately.
I think I am done with making foam things for a while now. At least I hope so.
Merry Christmas, mateys.
Posted by: Sarah at
04:51 PM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 75 words, total size 1 kb.
December 23, 2008
LINKS
Times vs The White House
Popularity IsnÂ’t Everything
Another Great Depression?
Posted by: Sarah at
05:54 AM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 13 words, total size 1 kb.
1
We don't have to go back as far as FDR to see the future. Just last night I was looking at a 1965
World Book Encyclopedia yearbook article on Congress, which in LBJ's own words
"... enacted more major legislation, met more national needs, disposed of more national issues, than any other session in this country or the last."
He
... asked Congress on Jan. 8, 1964 ... to declare "all-out war on human poverty and unemployment" ... All this and more could be done without an increase in spending, the President said.
So how's that war going, nearly 45 years later? Was "a $947,500,000 offensive" enough? Is any amount ever "enough"? That Congress
authorized spending in excess of $200,000,000,000 - more than any other Congress, in peace or in war.
How much will be spent in the near future, and how much will be lost?
I recommend the comments beneath Sowell's article. My favorite lines:
Let he who is without wealth cash the first check!
"What should the government do?" someone asked Ludwig von Mises. He replied, "Nothing ... sooner."
Posted by: Amritas at December 23, 2008 10:15 AM (miOrm)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
December 22, 2008
BEING APART
So I have to leave my husband this morning and go back to work to build a foam pirate ship. I wish I were kidding.
A link for this morning: The Politics of Everyman
Posted by: Sarah at
03:53 AM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 38 words, total size 1 kb.
1
I hope you have decent instructions this time!
Maybe the ship will take you to foam heaven ... unless it goes down the foam river Styx. And if it does, say hi to the foam Cerberus for me.
On a more serious note, thanks for linking to John O'Sullivan's balanced assessment of Bush. O'Sullivan does a better job of criticizing Bush than I ever could without demonizing him.
Should the president be an everyman or a superman? Many believe Barack Obama is the latter. Will they still believe that in four or eight years?
Posted by: Amritas at December 22, 2008 07:23 AM (miOrm)
2
Too bad it's not something ninja because then it would be invisible and you could tell them you already did it and stay home...
BTW, congrats on getting back to normal.
Posted by: Code Monkey at December 22, 2008 04:18 PM (WUbYJ)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
December 20, 2008
BACK TO NORMAL
AWTM
blogged from her second honeymoon. That's hardcore, and I love it.
Actually, what I really love was when she called me the other evening and asked if my husband was home. She hadn't read about the delays yet. I love that she called me even on the night she thought my husband might have gotten home. She knows I don't have a Do Not Disturb sign.
I've said it before and I'll say it again: You may tell me to stay away from the blog, but you know I won't.
And actually, it was my husband who sheepishly asked this evening if I would mind if he took a trip around the internet. It didn't bother me at all, because I had been trying to figure out the polite way to ask him for the same courtesy.
We've been having fun today, doing nothing at all. We went out to breakfast and took the dog on two walks, and I've been talking his ear off and cashing in some of those chips.
We are happy to be together again and to quickly slide back into our old routine. Except now we have two laptops. Think of the fun we can have being on the internet in the same room!
(And don't worry, Chuck. We're having plenty of fun other ways too.)
Posted by: Sarah at
12:01 PM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
Post contains 228 words, total size 1 kb.
1
I'm glad you're following AWTM's "hardcore" example.
How did your husband manage to bear being offline for so long without ending up like
Randy Marsh?
Someone should invent a tandem laptop with one screen and two keyboards for couples like you.
Posted by: Amritas at December 20, 2008 12:41 PM (o2B2q)
2
Mark and I have two laptops, and life is good. Wifi was the best invention ever. Now if we could only get the wireless printer!
Glad the husband is home!
Posted by: Sara at December 21, 2008 04:13 AM (Iwnkf)
3
Gotta love the dual laptops. Comes in handy when you want to have a conversation without involving the other people in the room ;~)
I'm SO glad he's home!
Don't need a wireless printer though. Just hook the printer up to the router and make it wireless that way.
Posted by: HomefrontSix at December 21, 2008 11:13 PM (4Es1w)
4
Congrats on the husbands arrival!
Posted by: Darla at December 26, 2008 10:01 AM (LP4DK)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
December 19, 2008
HE'S HOME
I got a call that they were arriving early, so I raced out of the house at 4:25. Guess what? More delays. We just got home, at 10:45.
Longest.
Week.
Ever.
But the look on my husband's face when Charlie tackled him in the kitchen was priceless.
On Tuesday, my husband apparently told his roommate in Iraq, "Do you know what this is?" His buddy said, "Your uniform?" My husband said, "The uniform my wife's gonna peel off of me tonight."
Yeah, three days later, he's still wearing that exact same uniform. Ewww.
We solved the mystery of where he's been all week. The story is too horrible and annoying to repeat.
But it doesn't matter anymore.
He's home.
Posted by: Sarah at
06:06 PM
| Comments (19)
| Add Comment
Post contains 123 words, total size 1 kb.
1
It's over at last!
You don't have to tell us anything more.
I am so happy for you and your husband.
I hope you two have one of your best weekends ever.
After the last week, the pendulum's gotta swing the other way!
Posted by: Amritas at December 19, 2008 06:35 PM (o2B2q)
2
Upon return from my 1st deployment, (way back in 9

I spent a few hours going through photographs and telling the stories behind them to my wife.
That time could have been MUCH better spent (which would have left us both spent.)
My point is, Get off the damn computer. Take that hiatus. Stay nekkid for a week. Order delivery. (Begrudgingly) throw on a robe when the delivery guy comes. (Or don't bother.)
You have MUCH better things to do than tell us what you're doing.
This applies to knitting, too... unless you're knitting a new thong out of licorice ropes.
--Chuck
Posted by: Chuck at December 19, 2008 06:52 PM (q4psF)
3
Ha! I agree with Chuck! Enjoy him while you got him!! Hooray!
Posted by: T at December 19, 2008 07:02 PM (/UP5m)
4
Completely jocund I'm sure.
http://www.thefreedictionary.com/jocund
Posted by: tim fitzgerald at December 19, 2008 07:07 PM (rASAT)
5
I third what Chuck said. No blog posts for a week, Young Lady! You've got better things to be doing!
Posted by: Miss Ladybug at December 19, 2008 07:15 PM (zoxao)
Posted by: Beth at December 19, 2008 07:50 PM (qkeSl)
7
Hooray!!! Have a beautiful weekend.
Posted by: Pamela at December 19, 2008 08:06 PM (NqRYi)
8
YAAAAAAAAAY!!!!!!!!!!!!! And Hallelujah! :-) Enjoy your hubby being home!!! :-)
Posted by: kannie at December 19, 2008 10:20 PM (iT8dn)
9
WOO HOO. Great news!!!! Now go enjoy each other!
Posted by: Keri at December 20, 2008 03:20 AM (HXpRG)
10
most excellent news, it was starting to feel like watching honey exit a bottle.
speaking of honey, use in small amounts. It can be like glue....
Posted by: AWTM at December 20, 2008 05:28 AM (A0AhX)
11
Welcome Home! Enjoy your time together.
Posted by: Susan at December 20, 2008 05:42 AM (kOpTG)
12
WOOHOO!!! The wait is over!!! Go have some fun reuniting with your man.
Posted by: Reasa at December 20, 2008 06:30 AM (2W7Iu)
13
I clicked on your blog with a knot in my stomach, hoping so much he was home. And now I have a lump in my throat and tears in my eyes. I am so happy for you. Have a wonderful, enjoyable reunion. You deserve every moment of happiness.
Posted by: Amy at December 20, 2008 09:30 AM (I9LMv)
14
Congrats, and Welcome home to him!
Posted by: That 1 Guy at December 20, 2008 11:50 AM (8l3lA)
15
Yay!!! So exciting! We are very happy to hear that you two are reunited at long last.
Posted by: Butterfly Wife at December 20, 2008 05:39 PM (1DRG/)
16
Congrats! I'm sitting here smiling for you--you made it!
Posted by: FbL at December 21, 2008 05:32 AM (HwqvF)
Posted by: Green at December 22, 2008 12:33 AM (6Co0L)
18
That's awesome, I can conjure up exactly how you feel. Merry Christmas!
Posted by: Pia at December 26, 2008 03:32 AM (SMV/V)
Posted by: cifiiqh at January 06, 2009 11:51 AM (sDqen)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
A MYSTERY
When my husband finally gets home, we will have a big mystery solved. The Mystery of Where He's Been All Week. Because I have no idea.
I keep calling people to give them updates -- my mom, his mom, friends -- and they want to know what's going on. They keep asking me questions that I simply don't know the answer to. They want me to speculate; I have learned it does no good to speculate about the Army. All I know is the one-line sentence I keep getting from the FRG: "We are meeting at the company area at ___ o'clock." Period.
I have no idea where he has been. I don't know if he was flying commercial or military. I don't know what he's been eating, what he's been wearing (he sure didn't have an extra week's worth of clothes in his ruck), where he's been sleeping. I don't know why none of the soldiers in the company have called home. I don't know if my husband has been getting this same hurry-up-and-wait treatment. I don't know if the delays have been due to weather or plane malfunction or what.
I wonder if he is hungry. I wonder if he gets on planes and gets back off of them, or if he's been sitting in the same room the whole week. I wonder if he's getting enough sleep, if he has a book to read, or if he has been as jittery as I've been.
I wonder if he's wondering what I've been thinking all week.
I can't wait to see him and give him a big hug. And I hope to solve the mystery in the car on the way home!
Posted by: Sarah at
07:54 AM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 288 words, total size 1 kb.
1
"I wonder if he's getting enough sleep"
In the military? Sleep? That's what Leave is for.
Posted by: tim at December 19, 2008 08:01 AM (nno0f)
2
So it isn't just my family that does that?? I'm always amused by it. They keep asking the same questions almost as if they don't believe it when you tell them you don't know. Frustrating!
Posted by: Kiki at December 19, 2008 08:14 AM (XgNcW)
3
Wow. Just thought I'd check in... This is crazy, Sarah. Just nuts! But, I guess you know that.
Posted by: T at December 19, 2008 11:15 AM (KV0YP)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
UPDATE
With no new info this morning, I came down with a case of the screwits. I put no effort into looking nice: didn't shower, just threw on some clothes and went out to run my errands. And the morning was not going well. Fifteen minutes in line behind some guy buying a coat with no price tag using a tax-exempt number. Went to the military pharmacy -- 10 minutes to find a parking space -- and found 40 people in line ahead of me. Nevermind. And then the phone rang.
My husband is crossing the Atlantic as we speak.
Several people told me not to believe any info I have until it comes from my husband's mouth. Well, that's all fine and dandy except none of us in the unit have heard from our husbands since Monday. The only info we have is the official stuff. So I will head to pick up my husband at the designated time tonight and just hope that it's right. And that it doesn't change again.
It's not like things can get any worse, right?
Oh yeah, and I have to go back to work in the morning. I am trying to get out of that one.
Posted by: Sarah at
07:00 AM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 205 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Well, that sounds like a decent plan. Except the going back to work part.
Assuming he hits US soil somewhere before home, hopefully he'll find a phone and call you to let you know what's going on. I guess I was lucky with my husband in that he was able to call and/or email me all along his travels home.
Posted by: Butterfly Wife at December 19, 2008 09:25 AM (1v+h3)
2
Quick...give me your number at work and I'll call in sick for you in the morning!!!!!
Posted by: Pamela at December 19, 2008 07:54 PM (NqRYi)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
December 18, 2008
GETTING TO THE POINT WHERE IT'S POSSIBLE I MIGHT CRY
No news is good news, right?
So I got in the shower, shaved my legs, put on nice-smelling lotion, got out fancy underpants, and was just putting on the outfit I was going to pick my husband up in when the 1SG's wife called and said they did not get on the flight, that they have been completely scratched from the flight list, and that now we don't even know which day they are coming home, much less a time.
I was supposed to pick him up three hours from now.
This really, really sucks.
Posted by: Sarah at
05:59 AM
| Comments (14)
| Add Comment
Post contains 115 words, total size 1 kb.
1
... to put it mildly.
I keep visiting your site, hoping for good news.
Two Real™ blogging posts this morning - a sign things are looking up? - ah, a new post! - an announcement of the return?
... but no, the ordeal goes on, with no definite end in sight.
Is ignorance bliss? Not here. You don't even seem to know why this is happening. The unbearable can become tolerable if there's an explanation, even an excuse. But apparently no one gave you any.
You await the next call, uncertain if it'll be for real.
I hate "seeing" you suffer like this. If only there were something I could do beyond restating the obvious, or asking questions like ...
How are your tear ducts?
Posted by: Amritas at December 18, 2008 07:05 AM (+nV09)
2
That seriously sucks!!!! I'm really sorry to hear that. I'm sure you are thinking "just put him on the darn plane already. My husband had several moments like that when he was deployed to Iraq last year and it was really frustrating. Hang in there.
Posted by: Slightly Salty at December 18, 2008 07:07 AM (GX+J9)
3
Yup, the ole 'hurry up & wait' routine. ItÂ’s as old as the military.
Hang in there, all good thingsÂ…blah, blah, blahÂ…
Posted by: tim at December 18, 2008 07:11 AM (nno0f)
4
no words. just hugs. damn.
Posted by: Lane at December 18, 2008 07:30 AM (X666r)
5
*Might* cry? I would've been a sobbing, angry mess (except when I was on the phone) for the last... erm... few days.
If I could be there, I'd play Hungry Hungry Hippos with you! (Or at least pay your range fees, LOL... ;-) *hugs*
Posted by: kannie at December 18, 2008 07:31 AM (iT8dn)
6
You, my dear, are a pillar of restraint.
I think I had half the doo-dah dance that you're going through at the end of Hubs' first deployment (when I still didn't know how things operated) and I was literally screaming at the FRG leader in a tear-covered, snot-flying type fashion to STOP calling my house UNLESS he was actually HERE. It was not pretty.
You know the rule at my house: I don't need to know about it until it's in writing.
I think that's a good rule for homecomings too.
I hate this for you, you know?
Posted by: Guard Wife at December 18, 2008 08:03 AM (N3nNT)
7
this level of frustration is just not conducive to a calm and loving reintegration... and why don't they [the amorphous "they"] understand this??? Return from the last deployment of ours was very similar, I finally decided that until I heard from DH HIMSELF, I refused to believe it. When I got the leprechaun call, I believed... until then - nope. I'll be the same way this time. And we never got calls from the FRG leader! she was no where to be heard from or seen... Although Guard Wife - I'd have given a lot to see you doing the screaming down the phone!
LAW
Posted by: LAW at December 18, 2008 09:17 AM (tqDBA)
8
And this is why the military spouse has the toughest job in the world! Hang in there!
Posted by: Tracy at December 18, 2008 09:24 AM (sGtp+)
9
Sarah - I too keep checking back, hoping for a one line update.. Hoping he is able to catch a flight back here soon and back to you.
Thinking of you
Posted by: keri at December 18, 2008 09:49 AM (HXpRG)
10
If this keeps up I will forget I am supposed to be a stately, grandmotherly type and just let all the words fly. What was that guys name in Lil Abner who had the cloud over his head? Darn!! Any kin to him? (that is supposing some of your dear peeps are old enough to know who Lil Abner is.)
Soon, Sarah, Soon. Just keep smelling good.
Posted by: Ruth H at December 18, 2008 12:20 PM (wWMQq)
11
So this was our R&R experience completely. Days and days of waiting. I actually got to a point where I was convinced he'd never make it home. So I went to the liquor store and drank a bottle of wine. I was all dressed up and had word he was supposed to get home the next day...sometime. And then miraculously he got home that night. Thank god I had some time to sober up! Otherwise hubby would have had to get a taxi. I didn't even care how I looked at that point and we didn't take any pictures. we were tired. Good luck. I feel your pain. Its breaking my heart that things aren't going right for you guys. Just get home already!!
Posted by: Sara at December 18, 2008 12:35 PM (er4b7)
12
Here's hoping for a speedy and safe arrival... fingers are crossed for you!
Posted by: Tucker at December 18, 2008 01:13 PM (iu62Y)
13
I know it is no fun - the waiting game.
Wish the Rear D would do the dirty work so poor volunteers don't have to take the flak. Not saying you gave the 1SG's wife any - just relating to other commenters. It is not the FRG's fault - but they are the closest ear sometimes when the stress is too much to hold back.
Our soldiers were delayed repeatedly coming home from Afghanistan and Iraq. In Iraq, the mission changed and they had to unpack everything from pallets in Kuwait and head back to Iraq! Now that one was especially hard to take, as people lost money on vacation cruises and flights/hotels thy'd booked. Then when it was time for them to really come home, we knew up front not to make cruise/vacation plans or take off work unless you could eat those days - because until wheels were up on their last flight, you could not expect them to come home. Flights were the issue. The Airforce deadlines planes much more frequently than civilian crews. I think they are safer - but much less reliable timewise, especially when trying to arrange troop transport.
I had friends who were twisted out of shape at the unfairness of it all. How? Who? What incompetence!
Here we go again.... same old stuff again... Marching down the Avenue...
I know it is blah blah blah "this too shall pass" but really... this pain will be but a distant memory soon when you get in your man's arms. My best to you two on reintegration!
Army Wife in VA
Posted by: awiv at December 19, 2008 02:19 AM (2PqnM)
14
Monique, a Leaf fan, originate this absolutely well-defined to believe. Now, let me core out that this was in no way an crack to official one pair is more wisely than the other. It was objective a regarding to official two things.
Posted by: picsir at January 05, 2009 11:38 PM (1nmQ+)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
YES WE CAN TURN AWAY YOUR AD
Heh,
this is rich. Apparently The Washington Post is selling classified ads to welcome the Obamas to the White House and has specified that they will only accept positive, glowing ads.
My favorite comment on this blog post:
It is only fair that WaPo post only positive comments for the winner of the election, after all, they did the same for Mr. Bush right? If John McCain had won, everyone knows they would have done the same for him too. I am also certain no liberals would have had a problem with that either and would have defended their decision. I am also certain McCain would have been Times 'Man of the Year' had he won, as well. That is why he was on the cover just as much as Obama was. Therefore, they are completely objective. People need to realize the myth of media bias is just silly.
Case closed.
Posted by: Sarah at
03:58 AM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
Post contains 165 words, total size 1 kb.
1
The WaPo is not a government paper. It doesn't have to be "fair." This is not "censorship," contrary to one of the commenters. The WaPo can print whatever it wants, including prOpaganda. So I agree with the first comment:
About time WAPO concedes that they abandoned objectivity!
I don't expect any, because no media source can possibly be "fair" to all of us, or represent a consensus whenever none exists.
The "congratulatory" requirement may also imply that the WaPo is aware of a very vocal opposition. If anti-Obama sentiment were not as strong, they wouldn't need to include the requirement, as they'd only get a few negative ad submissions and even fewer people complaining that their ads weren't included. But such sentiments are intense, and excluding the requirement would result in a flood of negative ad submissions and protests. The potential additional revenue would not make up for the bad publicity.
Posted by: Amritas at December 18, 2008 07:20 AM (+nV09)
2
I agree with Artitas that this is not "censorship"; however, the WP is owned by a public corporation which has fiduciary responsibilities to its shareholders, and to the degree that the paper's commercial decisions are motivated by the personal political opinions of its officers and employees, I think legitimate questions can be reaised about whether it is fulfilling those responsibilities.
Posted by: david foster at December 18, 2008 10:17 AM (ke+yX)
3
Good points, David. But how many conservatives own shares of The Washington Post Company? If the shareholders are predominantly liberal, isn't the WP "fulfilling [its] responsibilities"?
I'm not that upset by the WP's decision because I doubt that ads for Obama will make many new cOnverts. I'd be more concerned about front page reality distortion posing as "news."
Posted by: Amritas at December 18, 2008 11:00 AM (+nV09)
4
Amritas...remember, the company is chartered "for purposes of pecuniary gain and profit" or similar language. Thought experiment: suppose that a public corporation decided to give 50% of its net income to the CEO's favorite charity...and suppose the majority of shareholders agreed. I suspect that the minority shareholders would still have a case for violation of fiduciary responsibility.
I don't think this WP action rises to that level; indeed, it's probably reasonable, given that the ad section is for "congratulations," to ensure that the ads placed are really congratulatory. But I think much media-company behavior in recent years does raise the question of whether it is motivated by proper concern for shareholder financial interests.
Any securities lawyers out there who would like to comment on this?
Posted by: david foster at December 18, 2008 12:09 PM (ke+yX)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
HORSES
First, it was Michael Crichton's
linking horse manure to predicting the next century.
Now it's Thomas Sowell:
For thousands of years, horses had been the way to go, whether in buggies or royal coaches, whether pulling trolleys in the cities or plows on the farms. People had bet their futures on something with a track record of reliable success going back many centuries.
Were all these people to be left high and dry? What about all the other people who supplied the things used with horses-- oats, saddles, horse shoes and buggies? Wouldn't they all go falling like dominoes when horses were replaced by cars?
Unfortunately for all the good people who had in good faith gone into all the various lines of work revolving around horses, there was no compassionate government to step in with a bailout or a stimulus package.
If there's a bad analogy involving horses at the turn of the century, I haven't heard it!
Posted by: Sarah at
03:51 AM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 161 words, total size 1 kb.
1
One problem with the horse analogy is that horses and buggies have become obsolete throughout the industrialized world, whereas American cars are not obsolete. The technological gap between American and non-American cars is not equivalent to the gap between a buggy and a horseless carriage.
But acknowledging those facts still would not justify a bailout. Obsolescence is not relevant; it's a distraction from the real issue.
Fast food restaurants are certainly not obsolete. Two neighboring shopping malls near me each have a restaurant belonging to the same chain, offering identical menu items at identical prices. Suppose one restaurant is successful and the other is ailing. Should the latter restaurant be allowed to go under, its employees "to be left high and dry?" People will protest that it's not fair that one of the twins is dying. They want
cosmic justice.
But isn't failure itself a kind of justice? If the second restaurant is poorly run or in a bad location, does it deserve to be bailed out? Must others pay to shield it from the consequences of bad decisions?
As programs like
these proliferate, people will grow up believing that there never will be a "day of reckoning," as Sowell put it. They tell themselves "reality is optional." They confuse the subjective with the objective. They conflate "I want" with "it is." They don't question the assumptions underlying their desires. They should follow Ayn Rand's advice and "check their premises." But they don't know how. And we all fund their ignorance with our tax dollars.
Idiocracy, here we come. Believing in electrolytes won't make crops grow.
Posted by: Amritas at December 18, 2008 07:47 AM (+nV09)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
December 17, 2008
JUST FOR LAUGHS
My friend said something a while back to the effect of: Sometimes life gets so crappy that you forget it's not normal to do shots of vodka at 3 PM. It made me snicker at the time. I was reminded of it today at 3 PM and thought, what the heck.
Hooo boy. Why couldn't she have said "White Russians" instead?
Posted by: Sarah at
10:14 AM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 67 words, total size 1 kb.
1
You have a very wise friend...if it were I who said that, I don't remember b/c I was likely inebriated.
Posted by: Guard Wife at December 17, 2008 03:55 PM (eb8pN)
2
Wow. Vodka starting at 3? Did you at least add some cranberry juice and a splash of lime. That makes it healthy!
Posted by: T at December 17, 2008 05:52 PM (/UP5m)
3
As the British say, it's always 5 o'clock somewhere in the world. I suggest a margarita at 5 o'clock - for every time zone. Or Mojita, Yum!
Posted by: Oda Mae at December 18, 2008 02:41 AM (6zvrq)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
DELAYED AGAIN!
We had a new ETA for late tonight, so I ran some errands today and started getting excited. I came home to a new message on my machine saying that this timeline is also not happening anymore. The husband is stuck in Europe, waiting on his next leg of the journey. Maybe tomorrow will be our lucky day. Right? This is excruciating.
Posted by: Sarah at
08:12 AM
| Comments (5)
| Add Comment
Post contains 66 words, total size 1 kb.
1
DOUBLE ACK!!!! Time to break out the kickboxing... or maybe make something that keeps well in the fridge to celebrate - like your favorite flavor of cheesecake? {:-)
Posted by: kannie at December 17, 2008 09:32 AM (iT8dn)
2
Got booze? Time flies when you're drunk.
Posted by: tim at December 17, 2008 09:35 AM (nno0f)
Posted by: T at December 17, 2008 10:22 AM (KV0YP)
Posted by: Lucy at December 17, 2008 12:03 PM (0p14c)
Posted by: srfmrwv at January 06, 2009 01:41 PM (f8EL1)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
December 16, 2008
SELF-ABSORBED
The last time, I had
a vivid dream about the welcome home ceremony. Last night I dreamt that the husband and I were back together in our kitchen. I was wearing the outfit I plan to wear to pick him up, and he was drinking a beer. I woke up with a jolt and realized disappointedly that it was just a dream.
Today has been a very long day. Right now was the original time I was supposed to go pick him up.
I thought I'd better get back to Real blogging today instead of this dumb personal stuff I've been doing. But I can't seem to concentrate on anything lately. I just can't get into the news. Even Blagojevich's bleep-laden tirades couldn't compel me to blog. Only to laugh at home and tease my parents about living in Illinois.
I'm just sitting here crocheting and looking at the clock. Maybe I ought to do some things on that list; it seems healthier than this Waiting Game. I thought about going in to work today even though I got the day off, but the only task I have left to do at work is to put together more of those foam structures. That definitely ain't healthy.
And I haven't heard anything else today, no more updates, no new timeline, no hint of things to come.
Just lots of crocheting.
Posted by: Sarah at
08:59 AM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 231 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Whew! Waiting sucks.
First tip: Stop looking at the clock or the phone.
Second tip: Invite a friend over!!!
((hugs))
Posted by: T at December 16, 2008 01:26 PM (KV0YP)
2
Charles looks thrilled in his doggie 'do photo. LOL
I HATE the waiting for you! At least you are crafty...I'm so not and that means instead of crocheting or knitting, I pace. Or, bake and eat everything as soon as it comes from the oven. If only I could bake, eat and THEN pace, I might not have to worry about gaining a ton??
CRAP!! I want this to be over for you!
Posted by: Guard Wife at December 17, 2008 08:00 AM (N3nNT)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
WET DAWG
One chore down...

Poor fella. It's hard out here for a pup.
Posted by: Sarah at
04:56 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 16 words, total size 1 kb.
December 15, 2008
SO CLOSE
Aw, crap.
I just KNEW it was too good to be true.
Just got word that the husband's return has been delayed.
Man.....now there's no excuse for not washing the dog or cleaning the carpet.
Posted by: Sarah at
03:44 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 39 words, total size 1 kb.
December 14, 2008
A LOAD OFF
I was starting to panic a little that I got nothing constructive done today. And then I did some thinking and decided to
throw the list out the window.
I see knitting and Futurama in my future, not vacuums and dog baths.
Posted by: Sarah at
01:22 PM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 48 words, total size 1 kb.
Posted by: Green at December 14, 2008 08:54 PM (6Co0L)
2
I read your post over at SpouseBuzz and I think you are doing the right thing... get excited and enjoy the moments! All that other stuff can wait. Congrats!!!
Posted by: Tucker at December 15, 2008 06:07 AM (iu62Y)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
December 13, 2008
MUSHY
So
T linked to my
brain love post, and I realized that I have recently said that I only love my husband with my brain and that I don't want babymaking. Lest anyone think that our love is boring and passionless, I thought I'd point out an old post from his last deployment:
Anthology of Goofy Crap I Said to My Husband Back in 2000
We are mushy too, not just cerebral. I love him with my brain and my heart, and though I often quote that we "care less, eyes, lips and hands to miss"...really, I do love him with all those body parts too.
He will be home so soon...and I am thrilled.
Posted by: Sarah at
01:19 PM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 117 words, total size 1 kb.
1
LOL. I think we all kinda figured that out. Happy homecoming to the both of you. Bottle of wine, soft music, candle light.....lit the mushiness begin.
Posted by: Pamela at December 13, 2008 02:11 PM (pnhpY)
2
I liked this...
Your grammar mistake was cute, but only after I realized what you meant to say. You wrote: "I am so glad to find out that you read my email. I'm glad you are not worried. You have no reason to be my Sarah." I hope you meant "You have no reason to be, my Sarah"!
I love you. I have every reason to be your Sarah
"yours"
is a wonderful word is it not?
Enjoy, and I am glad you are learning from my past lessons and not freaking out...
Prepare your head, and heart for you will both need a soft place to fall. Neither of you had the luxury for months, and now you can.
Posted by: awtm at December 15, 2008 09:13 AM (r0jF6)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
December 11, 2008
T2: NON-JUDGMENTAL DAY
I've only seen the Terminator movies once before, and I was excited to see
T2 again. But...I had forgotten how frustrating it is. I mean, the premise of these movies is great: an unstoppable killing machine. (Though Lileks
is right that "the abuse that was once reserved for the Terminator is now doled out to human beings, and they not only arenÂ’t killed instantly, they are capable of acrobatic fistfights while hanging from one hand in a elevator shaft.") And this movie has the absolute greatest villain of all time. Robert Patrick turns my blood cold. He could play Santa Claus and I would be scared to death of him.
But the movie is just so interminably annoying. We're going to change the future and save three billion people from dying, but we can't kill anyone in the process because that's mean. John Connor might die and the world could end, but heaven forbid we kill a rent-a-cop. Enough with the lectures on morality and how evil technology is. Oh, and that speech that Sarah Connor gives about how all men do is destroy but women create because they have wombs blah blah blah. Give me a break.
I have lower standards than just about anyone when it comes to action movies. I will tolerate a lot of crap. But despite having the coolest bad guy of all time, T2 is really preachy. Stop with the voice-overs and get to the terminating already.
Posted by: Sarah at
05:59 PM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 249 words, total size 2 kb.
1
HAHAHAHA! So THAT's where Sally Field got her womb speech.
Posted by: Oda Mae at December 12, 2008 01:41 AM (6zvrq)
2
Oh the "men destroy, women create"thing drives me nuts.
Tell it to Rihab Taha (Saddam's Dr. Germ). Shoot, tell it to Casey Anthony. Apparently those women missed the memo.
Posted by: airforcewife at December 12, 2008 04:31 AM (Fb2PC)
3
Even when I first saw that, I thought it was pretty clear that Sarah Connor was unhinged and not to be listened to. Avoid unnecessary casualties, yes. But given the stakes, it wouldn't take much to justify collateral damage.
Posted by: Sig at December 12, 2008 02:14 PM (3E/Ak)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
December 10, 2008
LINKS
This
Stossel article is exactly what I'm scared to death of...
And this
Boortz article would be awesome but will never happen...
(Both links via Conservative Grapevine)
Posted by: Sarah at
04:17 PM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 29 words, total size 1 kb.
1
I have a question about knitting and crocheting. I don't know how to do either, but I was wondering if you could do both and which you think is easier. If I were going to start, should I start with one or the other. I am shopping for crocheted hats on Etsy.com and I was wondering, in your opinion, how difficult something like this would be:
http://www.etsy.com/view_transaction.php?transaction_id=12408502
Thanks
Posted by: Sara at December 11, 2008 04:29 AM (Iwnkf)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
105kb generated in CPU 0.0399, elapsed 0.1808 seconds.
65 queries taking 0.1572 seconds, 305 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.